![]() ![]() So that would explain, why every TV, no matter if an wide gamut TV or a cheap 400 Euro TV, is getting similar results on this one.X-Rite vs. I come to the conclusion, that the Laptop which is connected to the TV does not activate the HDR mode on the TV, so UHDA or DCI P3 or whatever HDR color I set, will be measured with rechtzeitig 709. Only DCI P3 is pretty bad, UHDA P3 even worse! The results on red.709 with similar settings are pretty similar. For that I switched to display cal, which is capable of, what hcfr is not. Gray Scale dE Handling Absolute Y w/gamma.gamma BT1886, Effective 50%, 2.2 and %input offset at 0%.I want to measure without calibration.īut basically what I did is, what you said: The guide you mentioned is for calibration. Remember, check the guide!! It explains what I said but in a easy way! Make sure all image processing is off for HDR. If you want to, only calibrate the HDR 2 point White Balance and Gamma slider. After that you can either leave Color Space on Auto or calibrate it manually to Rec709.Īlso, I recommend NOT doing HDR. ![]() Now calibrate 2 point White Balance and then 10 point White Balance. Set the Gamma slider to closest to 2.2 (“Measure gray scale” in HCFR to see it on the chart). Now go to Advanced tab and put “Color Difference Formula” to CIE2000 and “Gray Scale dE handling” to “Absolute Y w/ gamma”. For gamma select BT.1886 and put “Effective as 2.2 and “% input offset” at 0%. In HCFR go to Advanced > Preferences > References. Like for example which TV settings to change and what to measure. It explains the general concepts, what to do, in what order etc. It’s for a paid software called LightSpace. This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by Vincent. no contrast, gamma or grey balance variations. If you want an easier explanation, correction changes a little, minimal primaries and changes whitepoint. In the end it’s a constant matrix (3×3) multiplying measured coordinates (vector 3, variable) No, correction cannot change such things. Can that have something to do with failing the correction? No matter which settings I put on the TV. Second thing: I get bad contrast ratio with about 980:1. Make sure to disable ambient light corrections in TV for measurement. Which one… I cannot tell unless you read its spectral power distribution with an spectrophotometer, or find a review that has done that and plot it on an image. QLED or nano IPS variants => QLED correction ![]() Sicne it’s a new TV, very likely to be P3-like and have some of these backlights: Guess by primaries in native setting (or biggest gamut setting)Įxample: if primaries are P3 or close to that… it cannot be a White LED which are sRGB-like Guess by presets? I have to google what you mean by that … It’s a LXW944, Panasonic calls it Core LED. You’ll need to add “use simulate profile as display profile” for factory calibration validation, otherwise you’ll testing behavior un der color managed apps. Go to verification and choose a pattern, simulated profile, and actual settings, Tone curve unmodified and then start with measurement report.Guess correction by primaries or labeled backlight tech or check community database Then all measurements will be wrong and your tasks pointless. Choose the display, Instrument, Mode is LCD generic, no correction.Set all “calibration tab” settings to native/as measured, then make a profile (which won’t store GPU grey calibration)Īfter calibration profile will report 3 typical coverages (sRGB/AdobeRGB/P3), for arbitrary colorspace comparison check iccgamut & viewgam: I use x-Rite One Studio and have a Spyder X Pro as well.Ĭan you tell me, if there is a possibility to get a percentage of the targeted color space gamut with Displa圜AL, for example rec.709? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |